<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yearning For Traffic	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rnningfool.com/15068/yearning-traffic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rnningfool.com/15068/yearning-traffic</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:16:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>https://www.rnningfool.com/15068/yearning-traffic#comment-7311</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=15068#comment-7311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I could ever say that a piece of artwork is so wonderful that I have to have it.  I have no &quot;feelings&quot; towards art.  That&#039;s how I got on blog traffic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I could ever say that a piece of artwork is so wonderful that I have to have it.  I have no &#8220;feelings&#8221; towards art.  That&#8217;s how I got on blog traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>https://www.rnningfool.com/15068/yearning-traffic#comment-7310</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 04:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=15068#comment-7310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How did this post begin as a discussion on the arts - then take a turn to a unilateral discussion on the blog traffic?

Julia is correct though. It is one of the first things you learn (at some point) in the arts. Don&#039;t adjust your price for a sale - it will devalue your work for years. If someone &quot;loves&quot; it - they will buy it - and a price difference of X (depending on your history, venue, press, etc.) will not change that desire to purchase. 

Jeff Koons. $58.4 million for one piece. And he is still alive...
http://news.artnet.com/market/artnet-news-top-10-most-expensive-living-american-artists-11863]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did this post begin as a discussion on the arts &#8211; then take a turn to a unilateral discussion on the blog traffic?</p>
<p>Julia is correct though. It is one of the first things you learn (at some point) in the arts. Don&#8217;t adjust your price for a sale &#8211; it will devalue your work for years. If someone &#8220;loves&#8221; it &#8211; they will buy it &#8211; and a price difference of X (depending on your history, venue, press, etc.) will not change that desire to purchase. </p>
<p>Jeff Koons. $58.4 million for one piece. And he is still alive&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://news.artnet.com/market/artnet-news-top-10-most-expensive-living-american-artists-11863" rel="nofollow ugc">http://news.artnet.com/market/artnet-news-top-10-most-expensive-living-american-artists-11863</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
