<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Roid Rage	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/6058/roid-rage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/6058/roid-rage</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:00:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/6058/roid-rage#comment-3408</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 22:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=6058#comment-3408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bonds is an interesting case...especially his 2001 season.

While he was clearly on steroids while breaking the single-season home run record - he was able to do so by seeing very little pitches (averaging a HR every 6.5 AB). He was walked 177 times in 2001 (35 intentional) - dramatically reducing his chances to actually hit. 

But, although the 73 is quite a spike - his career is pretty level beyond that one stat. He came remained respected with intentional walk in both 2002 (68) and 2003 (61). In 2004 he hit 45 HR&#039;s while being intentionally walked 120 times (again - a dramatic loss of plate opportunities). He demolished Aaron (293) to (688) for his career in this category. From 1992-2004 he did not hit under 34 HR&#039;s per season - basically coinciding with his move to SF - and the drastically short field in right-field. 

That being said, he was most certainly on steroids. The sad thing is the tainting of his impressive career. One will never know when, how long, etc. the &quot;juicing&quot; occurred for. 

Stats certainly lie, and often, but the case of Bonds - (and this sounds very odd) he overcame the obstacles his talent (then improved by steroids) presented - and still hit the shit out of the ball. Barring his final 3 seasons (40-42yrs old - one only 14 games) he would be a .300+ hitter over a 19 year span.

Don&#039;t know...Hall of Fame?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonds is an interesting case&#8230;especially his 2001 season.</p>
<p>While he was clearly on steroids while breaking the single-season home run record &#8211; he was able to do so by seeing very little pitches (averaging a HR every 6.5 AB). He was walked 177 times in 2001 (35 intentional) &#8211; dramatically reducing his chances to actually hit. </p>
<p>But, although the 73 is quite a spike &#8211; his career is pretty level beyond that one stat. He came remained respected with intentional walk in both 2002 (68) and 2003 (61). In 2004 he hit 45 HR&#8217;s while being intentionally walked 120 times (again &#8211; a dramatic loss of plate opportunities). He demolished Aaron (293) to (688) for his career in this category. From 1992-2004 he did not hit under 34 HR&#8217;s per season &#8211; basically coinciding with his move to SF &#8211; and the drastically short field in right-field. </p>
<p>That being said, he was most certainly on steroids. The sad thing is the tainting of his impressive career. One will never know when, how long, etc. the &#8220;juicing&#8221; occurred for. </p>
<p>Stats certainly lie, and often, but the case of Bonds &#8211; (and this sounds very odd) he overcame the obstacles his talent (then improved by steroids) presented &#8211; and still hit the shit out of the ball. Barring his final 3 seasons (40-42yrs old &#8211; one only 14 games) he would be a .300+ hitter over a 19 year span.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know&#8230;Hall of Fame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bud		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/6058/roid-rage#comment-3405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=6058#comment-3405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t explain the higher HR total (small sample size?), but Chooch does have a BABIP 66 points higher than his career average.  That will even out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t explain the higher HR total (small sample size?), but Chooch does have a BABIP 66 points higher than his career average.  That will even out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
