<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Commenting to Comments	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 01:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MARK		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MARK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fans want more video blogs... 

&quot;Have a haappppy forth of July!..That was gay I don&#039;t know why I said that...&quot;  

rnningfool gold]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fans want more video blogs&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Have a haappppy forth of July!..That was gay I don&#8217;t know why I said that&#8230;&#8221;  </p>
<p>rnningfool gold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8438</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8438</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t think you were being a dick, I just found it to be a very vanilla response. You could have just responded &quot;okay&quot; and I would have felt the same about it. I realize now I just didn&#039;t get the JC reference/humor. Reviewing the verbiage in my comment it could be construed as I was trying to be a dick using the word &quot;plead&quot;, which I was not. It was meant as constructive criticism.

Brooke&#039;s analysis pretty much hit the nail on the head. You frequently write about how you want more people to comment and have a barstool/reddit-esque comment section that fosters further conversation and is a large part of what makes other websites highly successful. I have actually been following the North Korea situation a little bit and decided to contribute and when I saw your response I felt like Odd Todd applying for jobs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC6mzc_uq6k&#038;t=1m45s) 


I think Sam&#039;s response below is a textbook example of what you should be going for 

Jeff	  •  about 11 hours ago
I had a pretty obviously mentally handicapped driver the other day who happened to start off missing a turn and then ended missing a turn.

Are there exceptions to this rating system? This is probably one of only a handful of jobs he is capable/comfortable doing and he seemed genuinely happy to be able to help us get from A to B. Technically it isn’t fair to all the 5* drivers out there and it wont rid out the poor drivers as effectively. Should we let this bro slide and have him just cruising around in circles wasting peoples money? Or should we put the hammer down and 3 star him! Oh the mystery of life…

Reply
Sam	  •  about 9 hours ago   Author
That brings up two questions.

1) What you asked, are there exceptions?
-I would say almost definitely yes. Everything is situational, and there’s a difference between a guy being a dick and a guy doing his best with a disability.

2) What’s the criteria for a rating?
-Is it strictly “How fast did he get me from point A to point B”? Or, maybe he missed a turn or two, but if you had a pleasant ride or were happy because he seemed genuinely happy, then maybe the rating shouldn’t be that bad. I think this depends on the person.



As I said before, just constructive criticism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think you were being a dick, I just found it to be a very vanilla response. You could have just responded &#8220;okay&#8221; and I would have felt the same about it. I realize now I just didn&#8217;t get the JC reference/humor. Reviewing the verbiage in my comment it could be construed as I was trying to be a dick using the word &#8220;plead&#8221;, which I was not. It was meant as constructive criticism.</p>
<p>Brooke&#8217;s analysis pretty much hit the nail on the head. You frequently write about how you want more people to comment and have a barstool/reddit-esque comment section that fosters further conversation and is a large part of what makes other websites highly successful. I have actually been following the North Korea situation a little bit and decided to contribute and when I saw your response I felt like Odd Todd applying for jobs (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC6mzc_uq6k&#038;t=1m45s" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC6mzc_uq6k&#038;t=1m45s</a>) </p>
<p>I think Sam&#8217;s response below is a textbook example of what you should be going for </p>
<p>Jeff	  •  about 11 hours ago<br />
I had a pretty obviously mentally handicapped driver the other day who happened to start off missing a turn and then ended missing a turn.</p>
<p>Are there exceptions to this rating system? This is probably one of only a handful of jobs he is capable/comfortable doing and he seemed genuinely happy to be able to help us get from A to B. Technically it isn’t fair to all the 5* drivers out there and it wont rid out the poor drivers as effectively. Should we let this bro slide and have him just cruising around in circles wasting peoples money? Or should we put the hammer down and 3 star him! Oh the mystery of life…</p>
<p>Reply<br />
Sam	  •  about 9 hours ago   Author<br />
That brings up two questions.</p>
<p>1) What you asked, are there exceptions?<br />
-I would say almost definitely yes. Everything is situational, and there’s a difference between a guy being a dick and a guy doing his best with a disability.</p>
<p>2) What’s the criteria for a rating?<br />
-Is it strictly “How fast did he get me from point A to point B”? Or, maybe he missed a turn or two, but if you had a pleasant ride or were happy because he seemed genuinely happy, then maybe the rating shouldn’t be that bad. I think this depends on the person.</p>
<p>As I said before, just constructive criticism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you add this to your blog, the captions underneath the pictures will be bigger and bolder.  People like reading witty captions.

a.wp-caption p, a.wp-caption:hover p, .wp-caption p.wp-caption-text, .full-image-caption {
font-size:16px !important;font-weight:bold;color:#000; 
}

The reason I wrote that is because I saw the Zerg rush picture in the linked post and could barely read it and you know how I love a Zerg rush.


Also, you should go into your sites Wordpress menu on the left hand side, under settings, under permanlinks, choose custom structure and add this &quot;/%post_id%/%postname%&quot; .  Your current URL&#039;s are coming in as post numbers which is the worst way for google to identify keywords and for guests to know what your posts are about.  

Don&#039;t you love how helpful I can be!!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you add this to your blog, the captions underneath the pictures will be bigger and bolder.  People like reading witty captions.</p>
<p>a.wp-caption p, a.wp-caption:hover p, .wp-caption p.wp-caption-text, .full-image-caption {<br />
font-size:16px !important;font-weight:bold;color:#000;<br />
}</p>
<p>The reason I wrote that is because I saw the Zerg rush picture in the linked post and could barely read it and you know how I love a Zerg rush.</p>
<p>Also, you should go into your sites WordPress menu on the left hand side, under settings, under permanlinks, choose custom structure and add this &#8220;/%post_id%/%postname%&#8221; .  Your current URL&#8217;s are coming in as post numbers which is the worst way for google to identify keywords and for guests to know what your posts are about.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you love how helpful I can be!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My reply could be a whole post on my blog.

First, whenever you or I write &quot;From now on, my blog will change from X&quot;, I know it&#039;s not going to stick. I wrote this post a while back (http://www.bansheemann7.com/?p=6346) saying I would do the opposite of what you&#039;re doing, and post more frequently with less quality. That never happened. I post whatever stupid shit I think of like I always do.

Second, though I personally didn&#039;t think twice about what you said on my reason for blogging (aside from what it would be like to hit you in the face with a 2x4), it&#039;s very easy for others to take what we say the wrong way. 

Third, I&#039;ve been actively trying to give thoughtful responses to all comments on my posts. Think of how we feel when we have a post sitting up that we clearly worked hard on with zero comments. It sucks. That&#039;s probably exactly how a commenter feels when there&#039;s one comment on our stupid post, and it&#039;s them. I want to acknowledge them with the end goal being commenters feel more comfortable commenting, resulting in more comments!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My reply could be a whole post on my blog.</p>
<p>First, whenever you or I write &#8220;From now on, my blog will change from X&#8221;, I know it&#8217;s not going to stick. I wrote this post a while back (<a href="http://www.bansheemann7.com/?p=6346" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bansheemann7.com/?p=6346</a>) saying I would do the opposite of what you&#8217;re doing, and post more frequently with less quality. That never happened. I post whatever stupid shit I think of like I always do.</p>
<p>Second, though I personally didn&#8217;t think twice about what you said on my reason for blogging (aside from what it would be like to hit you in the face with a 2&#215;4), it&#8217;s very easy for others to take what we say the wrong way. </p>
<p>Third, I&#8217;ve been actively trying to give thoughtful responses to all comments on my posts. Think of how we feel when we have a post sitting up that we clearly worked hard on with zero comments. It sucks. That&#8217;s probably exactly how a commenter feels when there&#8217;s one comment on our stupid post, and it&#8217;s them. I want to acknowledge them with the end goal being commenters feel more comfortable commenting, resulting in more comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s funny is I honestly thought I was writing a humorous comment. If Alex looked at it the way you pointed out, which I have no idea if that was the case, you make a valid point.  I ask for comments and when they come I wouldn&#039;t say I dismiss them but I don&#039;t appreciate / engage them like I should when I &quot;plead&quot; for them. I can improve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s funny is I honestly thought I was writing a humorous comment. If Alex looked at it the way you pointed out, which I have no idea if that was the case, you make a valid point.  I ask for comments and when they come I wouldn&#8217;t say I dismiss them but I don&#8217;t appreciate / engage them like I should when I &#8220;plead&#8221; for them. I can improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One way to look at it is that if you can cultivate greater and more meaningful interaction with each thoughtful post, you will not have the tax of having to come up with so many posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to look at it is that if you can cultivate greater and more meaningful interaction with each thoughtful post, you will not have the tax of having to come up with so many posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I took the comment differently perhaps. My impression was that there was a slight level of disappointment on their end. The commenter appears to have spent some time writing a thoughtful response to your topic - perhaps with the hope of continuing the exchange, but didn&#039;t get much back in that department - souring the motivation to comment in the future. 

It&#039;s a tricky spot because essentially you may feel &quot;hey, I gave you my thoughts. That was the point of the post!&quot;  

The most valuable commodity any online venue can have is engagement. On the flip-side, fostering an apathetic audience is a recipe for decline. Enagement creates visits, &quot;interaction&quot;, etc. - which are what makes blogs and websites successful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the comment differently perhaps. My impression was that there was a slight level of disappointment on their end. The commenter appears to have spent some time writing a thoughtful response to your topic &#8211; perhaps with the hope of continuing the exchange, but didn&#8217;t get much back in that department &#8211; souring the motivation to comment in the future. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tricky spot because essentially you may feel &#8220;hey, I gave you my thoughts. That was the point of the post!&#8221;  </p>
<p>The most valuable commodity any online venue can have is engagement. On the flip-side, fostering an apathetic audience is a recipe for decline. Enagement creates visits, &#8220;interaction&#8221;, etc. &#8211; which are what makes blogs and websites successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/19016/commenting-to-comments#comment-8430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=19016#comment-8430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wanted to add to this post to point out the fundamental difference between our takes on blogging so it&#039;s clear.  I blog to create a successful website.  Sam blogs for personal enjoyment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to add to this post to point out the fundamental difference between our takes on blogging so it&#8217;s clear.  I blog to create a successful website.  Sam blogs for personal enjoyment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
