<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The All Important Law of Human Conduct	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/18638/you-will-learn-one-thing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/18638/you-will-learn-one-thing</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/18638/you-will-learn-one-thing#comment-8107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=18638#comment-8107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recall a guy I went to grad school with. He left a VP position at the most successful branding firm in Boston (which he helped form). When we asked him how he grew the company so well, this was his response:

&quot;It&#039;s pretty simple. When other firms meet people who could be clients, all they ever do is talk about themselves - or what they can do for them. Instead, we ask them questions, engage them and get them excited about themselves or their organization. It&#039;s a more meaningful approach, since that would be our job for them - to get other people excited about and communicate what they are doing.&quot;

As you note, there is obviously a fine line between engaging and actually demonstrating your qualifications. But, in a world that is &quot;over-sold&quot; everyday I think people respond more favorably by being engaged vs. hearing a pitch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall a guy I went to grad school with. He left a VP position at the most successful branding firm in Boston (which he helped form). When we asked him how he grew the company so well, this was his response:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s pretty simple. When other firms meet people who could be clients, all they ever do is talk about themselves &#8211; or what they can do for them. Instead, we ask them questions, engage them and get them excited about themselves or their organization. It&#8217;s a more meaningful approach, since that would be our job for them &#8211; to get other people excited about and communicate what they are doing.&#8221;</p>
<p>As you note, there is obviously a fine line between engaging and actually demonstrating your qualifications. But, in a world that is &#8220;over-sold&#8221; everyday I think people respond more favorably by being engaged vs. hearing a pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
