<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Getting Your Doors Blown In	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/18616/getting-your-doors-blown-in/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/18616/getting-your-doors-blown-in</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brookes		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/18616/getting-your-doors-blown-in#comment-8086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brookes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=18616#comment-8086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Try to save some $ for fantasy baseball season...


The issue with daily stuff vs. season-long is kind of what John Oliver alluded to: specialization.

Daily leagues require movements/selections based on circumstance and situation - or &quot;conditions&quot;. Interpreting these dynamic &quot;conditions&quot; and making successful selections is much more difficult than betting on longer-term trends (or a season-long league). Obviously, Miggy is going to get or approach 30hrs and 100rbi - so your bet is safer because it&#039;s a longer curve.

The fallacy of the daily leagues is their selling point that it&#039;s &quot;easier&quot; and because of the daily nature, you have a better chance. You have MORE chances to play, but probably LESS chance to win - as obtaining the information required is more taxing.

If you draft Adrian Peterson for a season, he will have a bad game or two. But you are getting the productivity and consistency of having him - which is a safer bet for your team than not drafting him on the value of the two underwhelming games. 

The daily leagues are like betting &quot;who will have a good game/who will have a bad game&quot;. Who will have a &quot;good season&quot; is much much easier to predict and forecast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to save some $ for fantasy baseball season&#8230;</p>
<p>The issue with daily stuff vs. season-long is kind of what John Oliver alluded to: specialization.</p>
<p>Daily leagues require movements/selections based on circumstance and situation &#8211; or &#8220;conditions&#8221;. Interpreting these dynamic &#8220;conditions&#8221; and making successful selections is much more difficult than betting on longer-term trends (or a season-long league). Obviously, Miggy is going to get or approach 30hrs and 100rbi &#8211; so your bet is safer because it&#8217;s a longer curve.</p>
<p>The fallacy of the daily leagues is their selling point that it&#8217;s &#8220;easier&#8221; and because of the daily nature, you have a better chance. You have MORE chances to play, but probably LESS chance to win &#8211; as obtaining the information required is more taxing.</p>
<p>If you draft Adrian Peterson for a season, he will have a bad game or two. But you are getting the productivity and consistency of having him &#8211; which is a safer bet for your team than not drafting him on the value of the two underwhelming games. </p>
<p>The daily leagues are like betting &#8220;who will have a good game/who will have a bad game&#8221;. Who will have a &#8220;good season&#8221; is much much easier to predict and forecast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
