<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Who Should Be Your Playing Partner?	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/17418/who-should-be-your-playing-partner/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/17418/who-should-be-your-playing-partner</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/17418/who-should-be-your-playing-partner#comment-7560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=17418#comment-7560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it makes sense not to look at their partner by name, but by score. When a partner plays well, do these guys respond to the pressure in a positive way (I&#039;d think on that stage most would), or do they fold?

Example:
Partner shoots +2 or worse = You shoot meh compared to your average because the bar is low, no pressure.
Partner shoots +1 - -1 = You play solid to keep pace
Partner shoots -2 or -4 = You play great due to the good golf around you
Partner shoots -5 or better = You play terribly because your partner owned you and it ruined your confidence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it makes sense not to look at their partner by name, but by score. When a partner plays well, do these guys respond to the pressure in a positive way (I&#8217;d think on that stage most would), or do they fold?</p>
<p>Example:<br />
Partner shoots +2 or worse = You shoot meh compared to your average because the bar is low, no pressure.<br />
Partner shoots +1 &#8211; -1 = You play solid to keep pace<br />
Partner shoots -2 or -4 = You play great due to the good golf around you<br />
Partner shoots -5 or better = You play terribly because your partner owned you and it ruined your confidence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/17418/who-should-be-your-playing-partner#comment-7559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=17418#comment-7559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If there was a way to get this data a lot simpler, you could actually come up with some fun conclusions. 

I&#039;d agree, just use the first 2 rounds and spread it out over every tournament this year and then start going back other years.   It&#039;s difficult to get because the playing partner changes round to round and makes it hard to track.  I actually hand did this one by one.  Not fun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there was a way to get this data a lot simpler, you could actually come up with some fun conclusions. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree, just use the first 2 rounds and spread it out over every tournament this year and then start going back other years.   It&#8217;s difficult to get because the playing partner changes round to round and makes it hard to track.  I actually hand did this one by one.  Not fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bud		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/17418/who-should-be-your-playing-partner#comment-7558</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=17418#comment-7558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a very interesting angle on determining probability of success, and there might be something to it.  Like you pointed out, using just the first 2 rounds of a tournament might be more telling since the better golfers are often paired with other good golfers for the weekend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very interesting angle on determining probability of success, and there might be something to it.  Like you pointed out, using just the first 2 rounds of a tournament might be more telling since the better golfers are often paired with other good golfers for the weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
