<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Google&#8217;s Algorithm is Valuable	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rnningfool.com/12194/googles-algorithm-valuable/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/12194/googles-algorithm-valuable</link>
	<description>Burning Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 17:11:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Stortz		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/12194/googles-algorithm-valuable#comment-5531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stortz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 12:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=12194#comment-5531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with you.  I sort of wonder if Google makes your page stronger with the presence of other sites linking to you or if it&#039;s just a function of more people visiting your site because of that portal.  

I wonder if we spent the day sending our page to hundreds of websites with the proposal of linking to them if they link to us would be worthwhile?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you.  I sort of wonder if Google makes your page stronger with the presence of other sites linking to you or if it&#8217;s just a function of more people visiting your site because of that portal.  </p>
<p>I wonder if we spent the day sending our page to hundreds of websites with the proposal of linking to them if they link to us would be worthwhile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sam		</title>
		<link>http://www.rnningfool.com/12194/googles-algorithm-valuable#comment-5530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 12:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rnningfool.com/?p=12194#comment-5530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We work to improve our SEO all the time. Valuable content and traffic are big parts as you mentioned, but there&#039;s something else too that you missed. Inbound and outbound links have a big impact on SEO. If your website has a lot of other (good) websites linking to it, Google sees that as a sign of good content or a reliable site which boosts you up in the rankings. Same goes for if you&#039;re constantly linking to well known sites, though I think linking to reliable sites has a smaller impact than them linking to you.

Unfortunately, us linking to each other and Gourlaysgoodies probably doesn&#039;t do much for our SEO.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We work to improve our SEO all the time. Valuable content and traffic are big parts as you mentioned, but there&#8217;s something else too that you missed. Inbound and outbound links have a big impact on SEO. If your website has a lot of other (good) websites linking to it, Google sees that as a sign of good content or a reliable site which boosts you up in the rankings. Same goes for if you&#8217;re constantly linking to well known sites, though I think linking to reliable sites has a smaller impact than them linking to you.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, us linking to each other and Gourlaysgoodies probably doesn&#8217;t do much for our SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
